IBM
Guild Systems
Guild ControlPlane
Cloud Economics
SIMULATED DATA
Tools|
Simulation Context
Persona:
Task:
Driver:
Policy:
Projected Risk
Reconciled 100.0%· ±$1K tolerance · 6 dimensions verified
ALL VIEWS RECONCILED
Multi-Cloud Cost Command Center

Know what the cloud costs. Prove what it delivers.

Actual consumption, commitment savings, forward forecast and investment decisions across AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM, Oracle, and Alibaba — in one closed loop.

SIMULATED DATARISK 20 · LOW
CLOUD ROI
-98%
▲ Operations leads at -97%
TOTAL CLOUD SPEND
$6.58M
▲ 6 providers · 20 workloads
BUSINESS VALUE
$0.12M
▲ 55% measured confidence
NET ECONOMIC VALUE
$-6.46M
▲ Evidence-backed
COMMITMENT SAVINGS
$4.19M
▲ 39% effective discount
FY27 FORECAST
$7.43M
▲ -41% vs budget
AI Executive Summary

Our multi-cloud expenditure has reached 6.579 million dollars across six providers, currently yielding a negative 98 percent return on investment that necessitates immediate strategic realignment. While aggressive commitment-based savings have successfully reduced costs by 4.19 million dollars, the dominant AWS footprint remains a primary focal point for further refinement. We must prioritize the identified 1.12 million dollar optimization opportunity to bridge the gap between our current operational expenses and actual business value delivery.

Source: Canonical Cloud Cost Model

Actual vs Budget vs Forecast

Multi-cloud spend • trailing 12 months + forward outlook
ActualBudgetForecast
ONDJFMAMJJAS$0K$200K$400K$600K$800K
  • Budget
  • Actual
  • Forecast

Decision Intelligence

Highest-impact signals requiring executive attention
4 INSIGHTS
AWS leads spend at $2.92M (44% of portfolio)Commitment savings of $1.86M achieved; 39% effective discount rate.
$4.19M annual commitment savings achievedReserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Committed Use Discounts cover 39% of gross spend across all six providers.
$6577K addressable spend detectedRight-sizing, idle elimination, and commitment expansion account for 100% of optimization opportunity.
20 workloads below value thresholdCombined ROI is -98%; retirement recommended after dependency review.

Business Unit Economics

Click any row to inspect the underlying cloud economics
Business UnitSpendValueROICommit SavingsAction
Engineering$3.12M$0.05M-98%$2.74MEXPAND
Marketing$0.86M$0.02M-98%$0.00MOPTIMIZE
Sales$0.94M$0.02M-98%$0.51MEXPAND
Operations$0.86M$0.02M-97%$0.65MMAINTAIN
Customer Service$0.79M$0.02M-98%$0.29MOPTIMIZE

Cloud Portfolio Mix

Vendor-neutral economics across 6 cloud providers
ProviderShareSpendROI
AWS34%$2.92M-98%
Azure24%$1.55M-98%
GCP18%$0.99M-98%
IBM Cloud10%$0.42M-97%
Oracle Cloud8%$0.50M-98%
Alibaba Cloud6%$0.20M-98%
IBM
Guild Systems
Guild ControlPlane
Cloud Economics Integrated Demo
SIMULATED enterprise data • 6 cloud providers • Customer-ready prototype
Metric Evidence

Enterprise Cloud Economics

Every executive metric is traceable to normalized telemetry, cost allocation, business-value evidence and planning assumptions.

Source composition

AWS Cost Explorer + CUR$2.92M
Azure Cost Management$1.55M
GCP Billing Export$0.99M
IBM Cloud Cost Tracker$0.42M
OCI Cost Analysis$0.50M
Alibaba Cloud Billing$0.20M

Evidence status

RECONCILED   100.0% cost reconciliation

Source system, timestamp, telemetry version, evidence ID and confidence classification are retained for auditability.

Trust layer

Sources connected
6/6
Normalized
99.8%
Reconciliation
100%
Telemetry coverage
97.9%