Executive Brief

The storage portfolio at a glance

Total spend, capacity, ROI, resilience, efficiency, and forecast — the five-second answer for management.

HEALTH 51/100SIMULATED

TOTAL SPEND

$15.31M

21 solutions · 28 workloads

BUSINESS VALUE

$0.73M

-95% ROI

EFFECTIVE CAPACITY

70,858 TB

37,120 TB raw

PROJECTED SAVINGS

$8.38M

optimization + commitment

RESILIENCE

77/100

0 at risk

EFFICIENCY

43/100

dedup + compression

FORECAST

$20.21M

budget $18.00M

PORTFOLIO HEALTH

51/100

Action needed

Spend: Actual vs Budget vs Forecast

Trailing 12 months + forward outlook

Budget
Actual
Forecast

Spend by Solution

Solution	Spend	ROI
DS8000	$2.10M	-97%
FlashSystem	$1.66M	-98%
Dell PowerMax	$1.23M	-98%
Hitachi VSP	$1.05M	-98%
Storage Scale	$0.98M	-97%
NetApp AFF	$0.95M	-99%

Health Indicators

Composite portfolio health signals

Cost efficiency

$15.31M spend → $0.73M value

-47

Capacity utilization

37,120 TB raw → 70,858 TB effective

Cyber resilience

77/100 avg · 0 at risk

Data efficiency

43/100 dedup + compression

Budget discipline

forecast $20.21M vs budget $18.00M

Key Insights

Signals requiring executive attention

4 INSIGHTS

IBM storage accounts for 54% of portfolio spendIBM delivers $0.50MM value at -94% ROI vs competitors at -97% ROI.

$6.29MM annual maintenance savings achievedMaintenance contracts and capacity bundles cover 29% of gross storage spend.

29120 TB cold data on hot tierTiering this data to warm/cold/archive could reduce $/TB by 40-60%.

$15309K addressable storage spend detectedRight-sizing, tiering, idle elimination, and consolidation account for 100% of opportunity.

Storage Executive Overview

The storage portfolio at a glance

Spend: Actual vs Budget vs Forecast

Spend by Solution

Health Indicators

Key Insights